Bug #605
Providers should refer to '@resource' instead of '@model'
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | High | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | % Done: | 0% |
||
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | 0.25.0 | |||
| Affected Puppet version: | 0.25.4 | Branch: | ||
| Keywords: | ||||
| Votes: | 0 |
Description
Providers were developed before we had standardized on the term ‘resource’, and they refer to ‘@model’. Provider instances should definitely refer to ‘@resource’ instead, and the classes should probably refer to ‘@resource_type’ or something similar.
For backwards compatibility, @model should still be set, but the methods should throw a warning.
History
Updated by Luke Kanies almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from 1 to 2
This is a small change internally and should be pretty easy, but it significantly cleans up the terminology, which is important.
Updated by Luke Kanies almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from 2 to Closed
- 7 set to fixed
Fixed in r2501.