Bug #11172
PE Installer should describe "certname" more clearly
| Status: | Merged - Pending Release | Start date: | 12/05/2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | % Done: | 0% |
||
| Category: | installer | |||
| Target version: | Commercial edition - PE 2.0.3 | |||
| Keywords: | empathy | Affected URL: | ||
| Branch: | Affected PE version: | |||
| Votes: | 0 |
Description
Overview¶
As part of project empathy I notice the installer does not describe “certname” very well. The prompt makes a lot of assumptions about the end user and the knowledge they possess about x.509 certificates and how they’re employed in the Puppet ecosystem.
The prompt is:
Puppet master's unique "certname"? [Default: pe-centos5.localdomain]
I’d expect the installer to specifically mention “certificate” and assume I do not know what a certificate is. In this way, I’d expect the installer to explain how it determined the value it automatically supplies as the suggested default. Finally, I’d expect a brief explanation of how Puppet uses this value for authentication and authorization.
Related issues
History
Updated by Jeff McCune 6 months ago
- Keywords set to empathy
Updated by Matthaus Litteken 3 months ago
- Status changed from Unreviewed to Investigating
- Assignee set to Nick Fagerlund
- Target version set to PE 2.0.x
Updated by Matthaus Litteken 3 months ago
- Status changed from Investigating to Needs Decision
Updated by Nick Fagerlund 3 months ago
I’d expect the installer to specifically mention “certificate” and assume I do not know what a certificate is. In this way, I’d expect the installer to explain how it determined the value it automatically supplies as the suggested default. Finally, I’d expect a brief explanation of how Puppet uses this value for authentication and authorization.
That’s… a LOT to ask, without turning the installer into a wall of text. I am for-real struggling with this, and do not believe I can give you all of it without sacrificing usability. I’ll try.
Updated by Nick Fagerlund 3 months ago
To speak the unspoken requirement I’m trying to balance this with: You should be able to tell what question you’re looking at without reading the whole thing. I think that stops being possible at about 20 words.
Updated by Jeff McCune 3 months ago
This seems a lot less important in retrospect. Maybe:
I can’t come up with a good way to cram all this info in.
Maybe we just close this and keep an eye out for confusion around this question?
-Jeff
Updated by Nick Fagerlund 3 months ago
- Status changed from Needs Decision to In Topic Branch Pending Review
- Assignee changed from Nick Fagerlund to Jeff McCune
I think I’ve got a minor improvement, of this and the SSL questions. (pull request)
Assigning this and the related two to you for review. Cool?
Updated by Jeff McCune 3 months ago
- Status changed from In Topic Branch Pending Review to Merged - Pending Release
- Target version changed from PE 2.0.x to PE 2.0.3